eXTReMe Tracker

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2005: Ed Harris in A History of Violence

Ed Harris did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Carl Fogarty in A History of Violence.Ed Harris portrays the Philadelphia gangster who comes looking for diner owner Tom Stall who recently killed two men trying to rob his diner..

Best Supporting Actor 2011: Nick Nolte in Warrior

Nick Nolte received his third Oscar nomination for portraying Paddy Conlon in Warrior.Warrior details a winner take all mixed martial art tournament whose two main combatants are estranged brothers (Tom Hardy, Joel Edgerton) fighting for their own difficult reasons.

Alternate Best Actor 2011

And the Nominees Were Not:Ryan Gosling in DriveRobert Wieckiewicz in In DarknessMichael Fassbender in ShameMichael Shannon in Take ShelterBrendan Gleeson in The Guard..

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2011: Results

5. John Hawkes in Martha Marcy May Marlene- Hawkes combines effortlessly a charming and threatening personality in his portrayal of a cult leader.
4. Viggo Mortensen in A Dangerous Method- Mortensen gives a strong performance as Sigmund Freud succeeding well in creating the charismatic and persuasive personality of the man.
3. Bryan Cranston in Drive- Cranston even with his limited screen time creates both an enthusiastic as well as tragic presence in his film.
2. Brad Pitt in The Tree of Life- Pitt gives an astonishing performance and fully realizes his character despite limitations created by the direction of the film.
1. Mart Strong in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy- Strong wins this year for me, even with Brooks who on re-watch I still love, and give a 5, but he is no longer my favorite of the year. That goes to Strong even though it is close very close among the top three. Strong is my favorite though who gives an absolutely masterful performance, there is not a wasted moment or even a single facial gesture in his portrayal.
Overall Rank:
  1. Mark Strong in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
  2. Albert Brooks in Drive
  3. Brad Pitt in The Tree of Life
  4. Bryan Cranston in Drive
  5. Tom Hardy in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy 
  6. Viggo Mortensen in A Dangerous Method
  7. John Hurt in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy 
  8. John Hawkes in Martha Marcy May Marlene
  9. Don Cheadle in The Guard
  10. Benedict Cumberbatch in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
  11. Ben Kingsley in Hugo
  12. Colin Firth in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
  13. Kenneth Branagh in My Week With Marilyn
  14. Max Von Sydow in Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close 
  15. Corey Stoll in Midnight in Paris
  16. Toby Jones in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
  17. Christopher Plummer in The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo
  18. David Dencik in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
  19. Alan Rickman in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part II
  20. Liam Cunningham in The Guard
  21. Kevin Bacon in X-Men First Class
  22. James Cromwell in The Artist
  23. Mark Strong in The Guard
  24. Paul Giamatti in The Ides of March
  25. Stellan Skarsgard in The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
  26. Ron Perlman in Drive 
  27. Laurence Fishburne in Contagion 
  28. Philip Seymour Hoffman in The Ides of March
  29. Robert Forster in The Descendants
  30. Oscar Isaac in Drive
  31. Chris Cooper in The Muppets
  32. Matt Damon in Contagion 
  33. Christopher Plummer in Beginners
  34. Matthew Lewis in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part II
  35. Ciaran Hinds in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
  36. Jeffrey Wright in Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
  37. George Clooney in Ides of March
  38. Yorick van Wageningen in The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
  39. Nick Nolte in Warrior
  40. David Wilmot in The Guard 
  41. Sacha Baron Cohen in Hugo
  42. Vincent Cassel in A Dangerous Method
  43. Tom Hiddleston in War Horse 
  44. Sean Penn in The Tree of Life
  45. Matthew Lillard in The Descendants 
  46. Jonah Hill in Moneyball
  47. Jude Law in Contagion
  48. Tom Hiddleston in Midnight in Paris
  49. Philip Seymour Hoffman in Moneyball
  50. John Goodman in The Artist
  51. Beau Bridges in The Descendants
  52. Ralph Fiennes in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part II
  53. Toby Jones in Captain America
  54. Josh Lucas in J. Edgar
  55. Michael Sheen in Midnight in Paris
  56. Tom Hanks in Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
  57. Tommy Lee Jones in Captain American
  58. Nicholas Hoult in X-Men First Class
  59. Armie Hammer in J. Edgar 
  60. Dominic Cooper in Captain America
  61. Hugo Weaving in Captain America
  62. Hugh Dancy in Martha Marcy May Marlene
  63. Peter Mullan in War Horse
  64. David Thewlis in War Horse
  65. Jim Broadbent in The Iron Lady
  66. James Badge Dale in Shame
  67. Joaquín Cosio in A Better Life
  68. Niels Arestrup in War Horse
  69. Nick Krause in The Descendants 
  70. Goran Visnjic in Beginners 
  71. Matt Milne in War Horse 
Next Year: 1947 Supporting (I might do this year differently) 

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2011: Bryan Cranston in Drive

    Bryan Cranston did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Shannon in Drive.

    Bryan Cranston who is currently giving one of the greatest continuing performances as chemistry teacher turned meth dealer Walter White in Breaking Bad, plays a very different character here in Drive. Cranston portrays Shannon a car mechanic and a man who organizes stunt cars for movies. Shannon has a limp, and just seems to be a bit of a sorry sort to say the least. One positive thing in his possession of sorts seems to be that of the driver (Ryan Gosling) who works at his car garage as well as does stunt work for Shannon.

    Cranston portrays Shannon as really a likable loser. Shannon repeatedly and unrepentantly remarks about how he really does use the driver for his own exploitation, but Cranston portrays the technically speaking less than positive aspects of Shannon with a certain warmth and smile. It is easy to see why he could so easily take money from the driver, as well even from gangster Bernie Rose (Albert Brooks), becuase Cranston has a genuine though low key charm in his performance. Rose states that he liked having Shannon around, and Cranston makes it believable that he would say that.

    Cranston very effectively acts as a bright spot in this film which is filled with very seedy characters throughout. Cranston does it well with a great deal of enthusiasm, and more importantly he is able to do this despite that Shannon really is not entirely not a bit of a seedy sort himself. Cranston though is consistently jovial in the seedier qualities found in Shannon, even in the moment where he tries to convince the driver to share the money from a botched money Cranston still makes Shannon likable in that he shows that really Shannon can barely contain his understandable self interest.

    The big reason that Cranston makes Shannon's self interest understandable is that he is able to portray a tragedy within Shannon, as Rose says in the film that Shannon never had a lot of luck. These are subtle, and short moments in Cranston's performance but are quite powerful when they do come about. These are mostly in small reactions like when Rose's partner mentions Shannon legs, and in just brief moment Cranston portrays a far deeper sadness within him. Cranston plays it well portraying that his more seeming overt happiness in the other moments, although while not a facade, is very much a way of him trying to overcome his troublesome past.

    Shannon really is a fairly small role in the film, and he comes in and out, but Cranston makes an impact within the film whenever he does appear. He creates Shannon into an endearing character, as well as heartbreaking in the end of the film. He combines the various elements into making Shannon a compelling character that adds well to his film.  Cranston makes what happens to Shannon in the end not just something that is part of the film, but instead makes it so the Driver's final actions all the more poignant and powerful. Cranston works extremely well with his somewhat limited screen time and turns Shannon into far more than he would have been in lesser hands.

    Tuesday, November 6, 2012

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2011: Brad Pitt in The Tree of Life

    Brad Pitt did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Mr. O'Brien in The Tree of Life.

    The Tree of Life certainly is a film that you either go along with the indulgences of Terrence Malick or you do not. I do not.

    What is really the best part of the film really is the character of Mr. O'Brien as portrayed by Pitt, even though the film's treatment of the character does not quite work all that well. I mostly refer to the fact that at times it treats him like he is the worst father who ever lived, particularly in the scene with the son contemplates killing him. That actually just made me want to slap the kid because although he is not father of the year material by any measure, he certainly should not die because the son seems to hate even the slightest bit of strictness.

    I think perhaps a problem in the depiction of Mr. O'Brien is that maybe Pitt gives too much of a complex performance for the way the film wants to represent the character. It is actually quite extraordinary that Pitt manages to give the performance that he gives considering the limitations brought on by the way Malick directs the film. It is always far more interested in scenery and spectacle of the world rather than the people in it, as the camera commonly drifts off faces, or to some angle that really would not be ideal for any actor in any film. This is probably contributes to why some actors, like Christopher Plummer, have a problem with Malick's methods.

    To the absolute credit of Pitt though he manages to make Mr. O'Brien the most compelling character in the film even when the film commonly drifts from him, or even sometimes drifts away from him within a frame of a single shot. Pitt makes a stamp on the film whether or not the camera seems to want him to do so. He creates Mr. O'Brien into a father of the 50's in the manner he carries himself, and acts around the children. He is very much head of the household, and Pitt holds a command over the proceedings in any scene where Mr. O'Brien is with his family. 

    Even though the film gives Mr. O'Brien a ridiculously hard time for being human Pitt never once leaves Mr. Mr. O'Brien as just a one dimensional being for his sons to hate. What is so important about his portrayal is the warmth he does put into his performance. Pitt always makes it abundantly clear that he does love his sons very much in the way he interacts with them, and as well grieves over another one. It is a very moving portrait of a father who tries to do what is best for his sons despite the way his sons my view some of his behavior.

    In the scenes like the one where Mr. O'Brien teaches the boys fight, or disciplines them in some way, Pitt never portrays any of this as random abuse. In his face, and his manner towards the boys particularly the way he really is always very encouraging, Pitt shows that Mr. O'Brien is trying to teach the boys valuable lessons, not just to punish them. Pitt always shows these as the lessons of a father who cares, whether he is right or wrong, the passion that Pitt puts into the part makes the character of Mr. O'Brien far more interesting because in reality he is not trying to be abusive in any way.

    The big attack against Mr. O'Brien by his son is that he is hypocritical, and does many of the things he tells his son not to do. Pitt actually plays it well because in the way he portray Mr. O'Brien, he is actually aware of that. Pitt portrays a genuine sadness subtly in short but important moments over his own flaws and lost potential. Pitt makes it so it is not that Mr. O'Brien really is being contradictory, but rather Pitt shows that he honestly wants his sons to be better men than he was. He wants them to be able to reach places that he himself never could.

    What is wrong with the academy when it comes to Pitt, I have not gotten to 1995 yet, but in both this year and 2008 they failed to nominate his superior supporting work in favor of his lesser leading work. This is once again a strange occurrence considering The Tree of Life was nominated for Best Picture, and the actual nominees were a sorry sort. It is a shame they missed this incredible performance by Pitt, that I think honestly went far above with the part. I really only wanted more of Pitt's Mr. O'Brien in the film, and it is truly astonishing how much he manged to do with this character despite the limitations set by Malick's directorial style.

    Monday, November 5, 2012

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2011: John Hawkes in Martha Marcy May Marlene

    John Hawkes did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Patrick in Martha Marcy May Marlene.

    Martha Marcy May Marlene is fairly effective psychological drama, even it is very much weakened by its ending. It is bolstered by its great lead performance by Elizabeth Olsen as a trouble young woman who has recently escaped from a cult that lives in a secluded area.

    John Hawkes is Patrick who is the leader of the cult "family" who takes Martha (Olsen) in. Patrick's first action with Martha is to rename her Marcy May, his next is to rape her as a way to welcome her to the fold. It should be said that Hawkes really is at a constant in this film, Partick never changes, and this actually is what probably helps him be a force in the film even when he is not onscreen. This is also certainly helped by Hawkes assured performance as Partick.

    Hawkes is excellent because he finds just the right tone with his character that variates with just the right degrees. Hawkes most importantly is extremely charismatic in the role of Patrick, and there is never a question to the way he sways others so easily in the film. He has a quiet sway that there is something Hawkes brings that makes Patrick's personality and actually makes it entirely believable that he is so easily able to make someone change their name by simply saying that is the way they see them.

    What is important though is that Hawkes within the charisma though certainly is never a warmth filled presence. He great in bringing to life the undercurrent of darkness in Patrick, and that Patrick's intent for his "family" certainly is not something positive. Whenever he abuses them there is no hesitation in Hawkes's portrayal showing that Patrick is only controlling these people for his own ends, and his charm is merely a trick to pull them in.

    Hawkes comes in and out of the film, and we never truly learn all there is to Patrick. We only ever see him through the view of Martha, and we never learn we here comes from or how he ever did start this cult who he is the leader. Hawkes uses this mystery well to create Patrick into a fascinating character, and is convincing no matter how far Patrick goes. One scene in particular when Patrick tries to say a murder was fine, is chillingly portrayed by Hawkes because he has so much conviction that he clearly conveys the fact that Patrick honestly believes his insanity.

    Patrick really is sparingly used in the film, and his character does not have a conclusion scene. He stays an enigma to the end. Hawkes absolutely does make the most of his creation of Patrick, and his achievements are quite enormous actually in portraying this cult leader. I did really want more of his performance, but really there is not a single bad thing I can say about his performance which is quite striking. Hawkes really can take a great deal of the credit and succeeds in being able to create the overwhelming dread and paranoia that builds in the film due to his characterization of Patrick.

    Sunday, November 4, 2012

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2011: Viggo Mortensen in A Dangerous Method

    Viggo Mortensen did not receive an Oscar nomination, although he did receive a golden globe nomination, for portraying Sigmund Freud in A Dangerous Method.

    A Dangerous Method is a somewhat interesting film about the relationship between the psychoanalyst Carl Jung (Michael Fassbender), and one of his female patients Sabina Spielrein (Keira Knightley). I can see why this film had such a tepid reception as the story really never becomes as compelling as it should. I would say that one thing that really holds the film back is Keira Knightley's terrible performance that unfortuantely is distractingly bad.

    Viggo Mortensen probably is not the first actor one would think of when casting the part of Sigmund Freud the founder father of psychoanalysis. Mortensen though from his first scene in the film proves that there is clearly not any miscasting. Mortensen takes on the part with a complete assurance with his portrayal of him. From his manner to his voice he creates Freud vividly. Although both his manner and voice are something very different from Mortensen usual on screen persona, they both feel entirely natural though, and only succeeding in making his depiction of Freud a compelling one.

    The scenes involving the discussions between Jung and Freud about their differences in regards to the human psyche. This is helped greatly by Mortensen's performance, and as well by the fact that Fassbender has better chemistry with Mortensen than he does with Knightley. In their first scene together as they first talk, and the differences between the two's views come out Mortensen is amazing. Mortensen as Freud absolutely controls the discussion, and Mortensen controls the scene. What is magnificent though is that Mortensen does this all so quietly, but through his calm but overpowering charisma Mortensen portrays power of Freud's personality.

    It is fantastic the way Mortensen with such ease portrays the way Freud would go unquestioned by many. What he does so well is the portrayals of the flaws of Freud. The reason why Mortensen succeeds so well in establishing the idea that Freud is very much unquestioning when it comes to his own ideas. There is no hesitations to any of his statements regarding his theories or when he takes disregarding someone else's who questions his own particularly earlier in the film. Equally effective though are the moments later on when he is taken aback by Jung's more fervent attacks of Freud's established theories, as well as even his stature within the community.

    When Freud is attacked Mortensen is great in showing that Freud barely knows what to do with such an opposition. Mortensen subtly conveys well a silent fear in Freud when he is being attacked, and really all that he does try to push forward with his charm again but Mortensen properly portrays Freud's considerable charisma that it wains greatly when he proven wrong. This is an excellent depiction of the character, and Mortensen really succeeds wonderfully with the role. I actually wish that Mortensen's Freud had his own film, or at least this film was more about just Freud and Jung as Freud is the best part of this film thanks to Mortensen.

    Unfortunately this film treats Freud a little too much as a pawn in Jung's relationship Spielrein, as Mortensen's Freud deserves much better than that. This problem is especially true towards the end of the film where Freud could use a better scene for a conclusion, but instead his last scene is more of there just for the main relationship between Jung and Spielrein. It is a shame that this occurs because Mortensen completely steals the movie, and Fassbender and Knightley (mostly because of Knightley) do not turn the central relationship into anything special. Even though Freud is misused in the film, this should not take away the fact that Mortensen absolutely meets the challenge of the character, and left me only wanting more of his depiction of Sigmund Freud.

    Friday, November 2, 2012

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2011: Mark Strong in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy

    Mark Strong did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Jim Prideaux in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy.

    One thing that always annoys me about the Oscar season is the way sheep like behavior prevails among voters in so many diverse groups. I find it so hard to believe that all those various groups would nominate Jonah Hill for his unsubstantial performance, yet it seemed difficult for supporting players from Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy to get even a few nominations. After all Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy had the greatest ensemble of 2011, and really several of the performers in this film would have been more deserving of a nomination than all of the actual nominees.

    This is especially true for Mark Strong who did not get even a single nomination anywhere for this performance. I can certainly understand why as Mark Strong is not a big name, which is always too much of an unfortunate requirement in the awards game, as well as this is an intensely subtle performance from Strong. I have to say it is a real shame that he went as unnoticed as he did, since this is quite an interesting against type performance from Strong. Strong usually plays fairly loud heavies, not that he does that badly. In fact he was quite enjoyable in The Guard as one, but usually the characters are almost prop like, such as his character in Syriana for example.

     Strong shows a very different side to his acting abilities though as the spy Jim Prideaux, whose story is one of the most interesting parts of the film. I suppose I should say this will be spoilers filled, even though just by nominating him I sort of spoiled the film a bit, as the character of Prideaux appears to have been shot and killed at the beginning of the film. Prideaux is of course not killed and his testimony is one of the keys to Smiley uncovering the mole at the top of British intelligence. This is an extreme case of minimalism for Strong as his total amount of lines are fairly sparse, and most of them are at the beginning of the film when a meeting goes wrong.  

    The amount of lines he has matters not in fact it only helps with Strong's portrayal of the introverted Jim. Strong in this performance conveys so much with his face, and with a single look does more than some actors do in a single film. He almost creates his entire character on this aspect of the performance as it really does bring tremendous power within it. This is true whether it is a less stressful moment where Jim meets one of his students, an introvert like him, and through just the slightest smiles and welcoming eyes he shows the fact that Strong sees the boy as sort of a kindred spirit. The same goes though when we see Jim being tortured and Strong flawlessly portrays the sheer horror in Prideaux as well as his waning attempts to hold on to his secrets.

     There is never a moment on screen that Strong fails to bring an honest emotional truth to his part of the proceedings, which stand as very important to the film. For the most part the men in the agency are either opportunist, or even they are not they are very cold like Control (John Hurt) and George Smiley (Gary Oldman), but there is the small group who, like Alec Leamus in The Spy Who Came in From Cold, are more deeply hurt by the tricks of the spy game. One of these is the hit man with a conscious Ricki Tarr (played well by Tom Hardy), and the other is Jim. Strong infuses a great devotion in Jim toward the service, as there he does not portray hating his time there, and seems to have regrets over having to give it up all together.

    Strong though portrays an especially great pain within Jim over having to find the supposed Mole, and his sadness in finding out one of them is betraying the rest weighs on him greatly. Strong though even suggests that there may be more to this strain as perhaps Jim has created suspicions in his head. This is where his friendship, or perhaps more it technically speaking does not matter, with Colin Firth's Bill Haydon comes in. They actually only share one moment together, and fitting to Strong's performance they only share a look at one another, but that says it all. Although as absurd as it seems the two actors in that short moment establish the friendship, and amazingly conveys the deep connection the two have.

    The fact that in the end of the film the mole in the organization turns out to be Bill leads to the two most powerful moments in the film brought about all due to Strong. The first being in his trailer at the school he teaches clearly wounded over the revelation, as well as embittered. Not one emotion suffices Strong as he portrays the intense internal struggle within Jim, as well still even has in the same moment he struggles to tell the boy to try to break his introversion, and not suffer from his fate. After this scene it leads to when Prideaux shoots Haydon in the most heartbreaking scene as the actors once again show the connection with one another, but Strong poignantly as well as silently brings to life both the hatred toward Bill over the betrayal, but as well as the sadness over the fact that he must kill the only person he has ever lover. This is a absolutely masterful performance by Strong, there is not a wasted moment or even a single facial gesture.

    Thursday, November 1, 2012

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2011

    And the Nominees Were Not:

    Viggo Mortensen in A Dangerous Method

    Bryan Cranston in Drive

    Brad Pitt in The Tree of Life

    Mark Strong in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy

    John Hawkes in Martha Marcy May Marlene

    Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More