Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2005: Ed Harris in A History of Violence
Ed Harris did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Carl Fogarty in A History of Violence.Ed Harris portrays the Philadelphia gangster who comes looking for diner owner Tom Stall who recently killed two men trying to rob his diner..
Best Supporting Actor 2011: Nick Nolte in Warrior
Nick Nolte received his third Oscar nomination for portraying Paddy Conlon in Warrior.Warrior details a winner take all mixed martial art tournament whose two main combatants are estranged brothers (Tom Hardy, Joel Edgerton) fighting for their own difficult reasons.
Alternate Best Actor 2011
And the Nominees Were Not:Ryan Gosling in DriveRobert Wieckiewicz in In DarknessMichael Fassbender in ShameMichael Shannon in Take ShelterBrendan Gleeson in The Guard..
Showing posts with label Chris Cooper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chris Cooper. Show all posts
Sunday, November 6, 2011
Best Supporting Actor 2002: Results
Best Supporting Actor 2002: Chris Cooper in Adaptation
Chris Cooper won his Oscar from his first nomination for portraying John Laroche in Adaptation.
Chris Cooper portrays the strange John Laroche a strange man who has few teeth missing and an odd hobby which is to steal rare orchids from state lands to cultivate one himself. This is made even stranger by the fact that Laroche actually is suppose to be a purposefully obtuse movie character that was written by Charlie Kaufman the screenwriter to be a purposefully obtuse movie character.
Chris Cooper's performance takes on this strangeness and seeks to exploit it for all it is worth. He certainly makes Laroche into an original odd creation that does work in the context of the film. He is suppose strange but humorous and Cooper is just that strange and humorous. I actually find he goes just far enough without going to far. A flamboyant strange characterization that is grounded enough to be almost a person well being odd enough to be the purposeful crazy character he is suppose to be.
Cooper finds the humor in his characterization without being too cartoony, as well as the strange sort of passion that Laroache has for the Orchids as well as his other hobbies he gave simply because he was done with them. It is a strange obsession that Cooper shows one that is very out of the ordinary, but Cooper actually does show a comfort with the character and his strange ideas that works well for the part of Laroche.
Cooper is effective and entertaining throughout his strange performance, and manages well with his few dramatic scenes too that are still the same character as the funny Orchid Thief. Cooper even still manages to be the part of the totally off the wall Laroche that is presented in the last part of the film becuase he makes it seem possible enough through his consistent portrayal of his oddity.
It is difficult not to be completely over the top with this sort of character but Cooper does manage it. I must stills say though although I like this performance I do not absolutely love it. He is a good part of the film, but on each subsequent viewing of the film I only am more drawn to Nicolas Cage's parts of the film as Kaufman, than to Cooper's parts. A good performance most certainly but just not one of my favorites.
Chris Cooper's performance takes on this strangeness and seeks to exploit it for all it is worth. He certainly makes Laroche into an original odd creation that does work in the context of the film. He is suppose strange but humorous and Cooper is just that strange and humorous. I actually find he goes just far enough without going to far. A flamboyant strange characterization that is grounded enough to be almost a person well being odd enough to be the purposeful crazy character he is suppose to be.
Cooper finds the humor in his characterization without being too cartoony, as well as the strange sort of passion that Laroache has for the Orchids as well as his other hobbies he gave simply because he was done with them. It is a strange obsession that Cooper shows one that is very out of the ordinary, but Cooper actually does show a comfort with the character and his strange ideas that works well for the part of Laroche.
Cooper is effective and entertaining throughout his strange performance, and manages well with his few dramatic scenes too that are still the same character as the funny Orchid Thief. Cooper even still manages to be the part of the totally off the wall Laroche that is presented in the last part of the film becuase he makes it seem possible enough through his consistent portrayal of his oddity.
It is difficult not to be completely over the top with this sort of character but Cooper does manage it. I must stills say though although I like this performance I do not absolutely love it. He is a good part of the film, but on each subsequent viewing of the film I only am more drawn to Nicolas Cage's parts of the film as Kaufman, than to Cooper's parts. A good performance most certainly but just not one of my favorites.
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
Best Supporting Actor 2002
John C. Reilly in Chicago
Christopher Walken in Catch Me If You Can
Chris Cooper in Adaptation
Paul Newman in Road to Perdition
Ed Harris in The Hours
